Oh Newt!

Newt Gingrich:CFR,CNP,Scottish Rite Jesuit, spoke at this broadacst that was hosted by Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa/see link at end of post

Newt Gingrich

former Speaker of the House and two time Presidential Candidate is leading the MSM this weekend with his inflammatory comment placing blame on Barack Hussein Obama for the deaths of Christians that have resulted in the Iraq war.

Newt told a crowd of merely 250 “Tea party” activists,

Gingrich brought up the story after being asked a question from the audience on the persecution of Coptic Christians in the Middle East, which he related to what he sees as a global picture of anti-Christian sentiment.

Gingrich answered, “What I would do is I would actively try to defend religious liberty across the planet, including in Egypt, in Iraq. Look, the number of Christians left in Iraq dropped from 1,200,000 to 500,000 after we liberated the country.“

He blasted US strategy in the Middle East as a “totally grotesque area.”

“People say, well isn’t this great, we’re having an Arab Spring. Well I don’t know, I think we may in fact be having an anti-Christian spring,” Gingrich said. “I think people should actually be taking this pretty soberly.” Source: MyFoxHouston

Quite a sensational comment to make,blaming Obama for anti-Christian Spring, since Newt himself was a key figure in instigating the War in Iraq. Newt bares the responsibility along with other Neocons who instigated the Iraqi war which led to the massacre of Christians since Saddam Husein’s fall. It’s almost as though Newt is counting on our short term memory loss, or he’s actually in-line with what his Jesuit brother is suggesting; that soon an “Occupation of the “Church”" (ie the Catholic church of which Newt is a member), be occupied and rise up to its own revolution.

This is a side note to state that Newt Gingrich (A Catholic Jesuit) and another famous Jesuit are sounding the trumpet once again for a coming ‘religious’ war in the US.

Jesuit Beadoin proposing a catholic uprising via occupation

What If “Occupy Wall Street” Could Be Attempted in the Catholic Church? Written by: Jesuit Tom Beaudoin

Back To Newt:

Leading up to the Iraq War, Mr. Newt Gingrich (33rd degree Scottish Rite Mason/Jesuit *this is not an endorsement of the site), led the pro-war rhetoric:

The president’s most trusted adviser, Mr Cheney, was at the shadow network’s sharp end. He made several trips to the CIA in Langley, Virginia, to demand a more “forward-leaning” interpretation of the threat posed by Saddam. When he was not there to make his influence felt, his chief of staff, Lewis “Scooter” Libby, was. Such hands-on involvement in the processing of intelligence data was unprecedented for a vice-president in recent times, and it put pressure on CIA officials to come up with the appropriate results.

Another frequent visitor was Newt Gingrich, the former Republican party leader who resurfaced after September 11 as a Pentagon “consultant” and a member of its unpaid defense advisory board, with influence far beyond his official title.

An intelligence official confirmed Mr Gingrich made “a couple of visits” but said there was nothing unusual about that.

Rick Tyler, Mr Gingrich’s spokesman, said: “If he was at the CIA he was there to listen and learn, not to persuade or influence.”

Mr Gingrich visited Langley three times before the war, and according to accounts, the political veteran sought to browbeat analysts into toughening up their assessments of Saddam’s menace.

Mr Gingrich gained access to the CIA headquarters and was listened to because he was seen as a personal emissary of the Pentagon and, in particular, of the OSP. Source: Click Here

New York Times (10/12/01):
On September 19-20 the Defense Policy Board met for 19 hours to discuss the ramifications of the attacks of September 11. The group agreed on the need to turn on Iraq as soon as the initial phase of the war against Afghanistan was over. The group included deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, and former high-ranking officials such as William Bennett, Jeanne Kirkpatrick, Newt Gingrich, and Richard Perle. Gingrich declared that the U. S. needed a major geopolitical victory in response to the attacks. “Bombing a few caves in Afghanistan” wasn’t going to do it, he said, but overthrowing Iraq’s government would.
“If we don’t use this as the moment to replace Saddam after we replace the Taliban, we are setting the stage for disaster,” Gingrich said in an interview. Source: click here

U.S. threats of war on Iraq have sparked a rash of controversy and debate. Other world powers have loudly objected: “There is no indication, no proof that Iraq is involved in the terrorism we have been talking about for the last few months,” declared Germany’s Deputy Foreign Minister. “This terror argument cannot be used to legitimize old enmities.”

UN Secretary General Kofi Annan stated, “Any attempt or any decision to attack Iraq today will be unwise and could lead to a major escalation in the region.” Saudi leaders and Jordan’s King Abdullah have spoken out against the war, and Turkey’s President Sezer warned, “Turkey attaches great importance to preserving Iraq’s territorial and national integrity. “

The Washington Post (3/11/02) reported that these comments “represent a growing consensus among regional leaders that the risks of an attack on Iraqi pres Saddam Hussein far outweigh any threat he may pose.” Source: click here

More of Newt’s eye for War

September 23, 2001: Gingrich Wants Iraq War, Says ‘Bombing Some Caves Is Not Something that Counts’

Prominent neoconservative Newt Gingrich tells Newsweek, “When the US loses what may be more than 6,000 people [on 9/11], there has to be reaction so that the world clearly knows that things have changed.… [There is] a recognition that it will be very tough to get bin Laden in the rocky and mountainous terrain of Afghanistan. There’s a feeling that we’ve got to do something that counts—and bombing some caves is not something that counts.” [Newsweek, 9/23/2001; Newsweek, 8/28/2007] Newsweek will comment on the quote in 2007: “Rather than [fight in Afghanistan], the US military wanted to fight on a grander stage, where it could show off its mobility and firepower. To the civilian bosses at the Pentagon and the eager-to-please top brass, Iraq was a much better target. By invading Iraq, the United States would give the Islamists—and the wider world—an unforgettable lesson in American power. ” [Newsweek, 8/28/2007]

April 18, 2008: Newt Gingrich Says People ‘Will Give Up All Their Liberties’ When Faced with Threat

While speaking to students at Drew University, prominent neoconservative and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich is asked how the US government could justify violating personal rights with domestic eavesdropping and the Patriot Act. He responds: “If there’s a threat, you have a right to defend society. People will give up all their liberties to avoid that level of threat.” [New Jersey Star-Ledger, 4/18/2008] Really? That doesn’t sound like America.

Newt’s Fetish for Fundamentalism (more like Ecumenicism)

Rediscover God in America was webcasted to the following Calvary Chapel’s including: Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa on March 26, 2011

Gingrich is highly dangerous and he floats in and out in various agencies (and Churches) as he so desires. Now he’s (cough) attempting to become potus? I don’t think so, he’s not trying to be potus anymore than any of the other candidates. They are there to do a job and that’s to mislead the American people. Newt has been embraced by the Religious Right (CNP, AFA, Heritage Foundation, Justice at the Gate, NAR (inc. Rick Joyner (Jesuit), Cindy Jacobs, Lour Engle, David Barton (CNP), Freedom Federation). He’s Apostate at best, agent for doctrines of demons at worst. So is he being promoted by your pastor? I suggest you inform your pastor who Newt really is.

Advertisement